It’s
the end of another summer and the end of another carnival season. The majority of us who attended the Notting
Hill Carnival last Monday are fighting off cold and flu in one form or another,
the inevitable price to pay from participating in the wettest event in over
thirty years. Of course in hindsight it
was a tiny penalty to pay when balanced against the uniqueness of the occasion.
It
was whilst wrapped up in my duvet (with my hot orange juice on the sofa) that I stumbled
across the BBC’s “Sunday Morning Live” earlier, and observed a discussion about
fracking. It made me smile because I was
immediately transported back twelve months when I was very angry with the city
I lived in and at the community who had allowed this to happen. One of the things I suggested a year ago at
the height of my fury was that if the Government wanted to introduce fracking,
they should look no further than Nottingham as it was a community that would
offer “no opposition” and would “roll over” and allow the intrusive activity to
take place without any resistance at all.
Just
over a year ago I launched
a boycott against the Nottingham Caribbean Carnival following their hugely
controversial decision to introduce an admission fee to the event. It was a move I scornfully derided as the
Carnival Tax. I made alternative plans to take my seat at
the Emirates Stadium and to be as far away from the city as possible. It was a horrible day for me.
Things
were compounded further when to my horror, my Monday visit to Notting Hill
Carnival the following week to watch acts performing on the Mastermind stage, coincided with
a performance from none other than Ms Dynamite.
This was the same Niomi who I had clashed with on Twitter decrying her
decision to perform at the treacherous festival which was bastardising the name
of carnival. Having highlighted to the
fellow north Londoner about what the organisers behind Nottingham Carnival had
lined up with their plans for a tax, she blocked
me and then spoke of her pride of being part of the sham.
So
when I heard Ms Dynamite being introduced to the stage, I left the area. I had no interest in watching someone I had labelled
a “scab” for even a split second. And I
wasn’t going to allow her presence to infuriate me and spoil what is such a
special weekend for me. This was quite a turnaround. Only a few weeks earlier, a picture of Ms
Dynamite took pride of place in my front room.
It was taken with my cousin in Ayia Napa who had mutual friends at the
time. We all did. We were all roughly the same age and her
secondary school was approximately 15 minutes’ walk from where mine was.
I’d
always been proud of her accomplishments, someone from our corner of north
London who had achieved a significant level of success. Being mixed race from a single parent family,
she was a role model for lots of us. That
all changed
when she committed such an unforgivable betrayal. This was someone who shot to fame on the back
of being a break from the contemporary artists at the time. Her track “It Takes
More” contained lyrics about the exploitation of the third world back in
2002. Eleven years later she was happy
to participate in the exploitation of one of the poorest cities in the
UK.
About
a month ago I was contacted by some very distressed residents of Nottingham who
realised that the “voluntary contribution of £1” which had been introduced to
the Nottingham Carnival in 2013 had now evolved into a compulsory admission fee
of £2. More worryingly, neighbouring Leicester
had also pushed ahead with its own Carnival Tax and was charging patrons £3.
It’s
fair to say I did my fair share of “I told you so” and proudly reposted my
piece from July 2013. Practically
everything I had warned had come to pass.
That the fee wouldn’t stay at £1, that it was compulsory in all but name
and that the disgraceful idea would be copied by other events around the UK
under the guise of coping in times of austerity. But once I had savoured my moment of
posturing, I knew that the most important thing was to communicate to everyone
why boycotting the Leicester and Nottingham events was so important.
However
shortly after recommencing the boycott campaign, I was deeply alarmed that the
local radio station Kemet FM wanted to support the boycott. I maintained last summer that the station
were complicit in the implementation of the Carnival Tax because of their
support for the 2013 event, despite me pleading with the station to change
their stance.
This
is the radio station that I had proudly supported since its creation, a
broadcaster I told family and friends in London to listen to online as they
were the natural successors to Choice
FM. It was a local community station who
upheld the values of that original south London radio station from 1990. I will never forgive Niomi Daley for what she
did and she has forever lost my respect.
I hope whatever she was paid for sacrificing her ethics was worth it but
I struggle to understand how she can sleep at night. But her damaging actions only formed part of
the problem and it would be wrong to place all of the blame at her
doorstep. Reya El Salahi, Marcia
Griffiths, Kemet FM & every performing artist must share equal
responsibility for the role they played in the betrayal of carnival values in
2013.
I
was horrified to learn that Kemet FM now wanted to play the role of local
saviours after proclaiming that they would now boycott the 2014 event. This was what I urged them to do in
2013. I stopped listening to the radio
station on the day the 2013 Nottingham Carnival took place and vowed never to
tune in again. I felt the position they
were trying to adopt in 2014 was deeply offensive, not to mention incredibly hypocritical.
Some
might argue that they saw the light in the end and tried to make amends for the
mistakes or error of judgement they made in 2013. It’s an argument which also extends to the
majority of the people who supported the 2014 boycott but attended the 2013
gathering. But I think we need to make a
distinction here. Yes the local
community were duped, “sold a dream” as I described at the end of July this
year. It is easier to understand why
they were conned, but less so for the broadcaster, who I had been in direct
contact with right up to a couple of days before the 2013 event. I only stopped engaging with them at that
late hour when it became crystal clear that there was no way they would back
down from their stance to support the Nottingham Carnival and therefore the
Carnival Tax.
The
2014 boycott was much more successful. I
explained to fellow campaigners straight away that it was a waste of time communicating
with Renwick and the rest of the Nottingham Carnival Committee; I cited the
email exchange from July 2013, the campaign I had pushed a year ago and the
piece I had written. I explained that
the best course of action was to contact the local authority instead. Nottingham Council still allocated an annual
funding grant because the event was being promoted as a carnival, even though this
was a festival in all but name due to the Carnival Tax policy. It was essential that the local authority was
lobbied on this basis.
About
two weeks after I began actively promoting the boycott again, the alcohol
licence for the 2014 event was withdrawn. It was to be a significant act because it
eventually led to Nottingham Carnival organisers altering their policy
overnight. John Holt had been advertised
as being the lead act to perform at this year’s event, and was immediately pulled
from the bill. In addition the Carnival
Tax was cancelled.
Nobody
from Nottingham Council has ever communicated with me directly to state that
the pressure I applied and helped to mobilise to its doorstep was responsible,
partially or otherwise, for the alcohol licence being withdrawn. So it will remain open to speculation as to
whether or not our pressure really did achieve anything. But I think most who followed the campaign
last year and again this year will probably put two and two together and with
the absence of any definitive evidence to the contrary, it is a fair conclusion
to reach.
Of
course the late shifting of the position of the Nottingham Carnival organisers
was incredibly amusing. A year ago I
contacted the committee and Renwick in July, a full three weeks before the
event was taking place. Among the
reasons offered as an explanation as to why the Carnival Tax would stay in 2013
was because it was “too late” to change the literature for posters etc. So imagine my laughter when Renwick and his
ghastly committee members scrambled to change their stance (and literature)
with barely a week to go until the staging of the 2014 event.
On
the day of the carnival, once again I was 144 miles away in north London. Although unlike the events of summer 2013,
this time I was basking in the joy of an opening day victory as I commenced my
fourth season as an Arsenal Season Ticket holder. I even had a picture of
Chris Hudson smiling, the fan I sit next to and whose rant after the defeat to
Aston Villa twelve months ago epitomised so much of the pain that I suffered
that weekend.
The
2014 event was not a success and this was down to the resolve of local
campaigners who helped to ensure that the boycott was widely publicised ahead
of the weekend. As an aside, I would
have been at the carnival in Nottingham under the revised plans, but not while
it was being administered by Renwick and his colleagues. I think it is time for a new committee to step
forward in Nottingham. Renwick and his fellow committee members have no credibility left and are a part of a toxic brand now, contaminating anything they organise.
No comments:
Post a Comment