Ten years ago fourteen
year old Danielle Beccan was shot dead travelling home
from the Goose Fair which is held in Nottingham every October. It was the latest in a series of incidents of
gun crime in the city and ultimately proved to be a high-water mark in terms of
how Nottingham was viewed across the UK.
It had been the subject of national attention as far back as 2000 thanks to a decision
to routinely arm officers patrolling certain areas of the city- the first on
the British mainland to do so. Now it
serves as a shining example of a city that has slashed the number of offences
involving firearms and everyone deserves an enormous amount of credit for the impressive
turnaround.
Shortly after Danielle was
murdered, a memorial vigil
took place in the town centre, and I think although on one level it was
intended to show solidarity with the Beccan family, it also served another
purpose. It was as if the city was
collectively coming together and conveyed a signal that this was a problem for
Nottingham. Not a problem for black
people or certain ethnic groups of certain areas, but an issue for everyone and
affected every single citizen of the city.
This was a powerful message and in many ways goes on to explain the
approach of the police force which did not follow the lead set in London by introducing
a new sub-autonomous unit to tackle the problem.
One of the significant
things that the local force Nottinghamshire Police did was to pay particular
attention to the people actually supplying the firearms into the city. It is no coincidence that the fall in the
number of recorded offences in Nottingham can be directly attributed to some
very high profile convictions
of individuals associated with the distribution of firearms, among other
offences.
Last Saturday a public meeting
took place in Tottenham, north London.
The meeting was called by Tottenham Rights co-ordinator Stafford Scott after
the family of Mark Duggan discovered that the jury in the original inquest into
his death were not provided with all of the relevant facts. It was the death of Mark at the hands of
police marksmen that ignited
the biggest social unrest seen in the UK for a quarter of a century.
A number of highly damning
revelations were made that evening, but the most astonishing related to Trident,
the Metropolitan Police unit tasked with tackling gun crime within the black
community. Stafford Scott, addressing the
audience gathered in Tottenham, outlined the events leading up to the shooting
of Mark on Ferry Lane who had been under police surveillance during the final
48 hours of his life. In particular he analysed
the exchange between Kevin Hutchinson-Foster, subsequently convicted
and sentenced to seven years for supplying the weapon, and Mark on Vicarage
Road in Leyton:
“The handover of, whatever
it was, took place in Vicarage Road in front of the Trident officers. They didn’t do anything because Mark was
being set-up by their man.”
This is an explosive allegation
and can be substantiated by the fact that Trident officers insist that the
reason why they failed to witness the exchange was because the cab carrying Mark
Duggan turned instead into Burchell Road.
Yet the GPS system on the minicab transporting Mark confirmed that this
did not happen and that the vehicle indeed went to Vicarage Road. The reason this seemingly innocuous discrepancy
is so important is because it adds weight to the suggestion that Trident
officers had a chance to intercept the firearm before Mark left Vicarage
Road. There was an opportunity to arrest
Hutchinson-Foster at the same time, so why was this not done?
The brother of Mark Duggan,
Shaun Hall, also addressed the meeting and equally highlighted this crucial
discrepancy and questioned the nature of the relationship between
Hutchinson-Foster and Trident:
“…Trident officers
witnessed the handover but deny doing so, why?
Could it be they’re desperate to conceal the identity of the gun
supplier, because he’s working for them?
After they killed Mark…why didn’t they go back and arrest Kevin
Hutchinson-Foster? He’s on parole, they
know his parole officer, but they fail to make contact. Kevin Hutchinson-Foster is only arrested once
the IPCC conducts a forensic analysis of the gun found at the scene. This is on
October 24th…thirteen weeks to be precise after he’s been identified
as the supplier of the weapons.”
When Hutchinson-Foster was
charged he was placed in solitary confinement and this potentially amounts to
another piece of the puzzle which paints a very disturbing picture, suggesting that
he was in need of some kind of protection.
Placing him within the general population was assessed as being a risk
too great.
Trident was established
in 2000 and was disbanded
(as we know it) last year. Could it be
that investigations from those campaigning for justice for Mark Duggan have
threatened to expose a highly toxic brand of corruption within a unit of the
Metropolitan Police? The official reason
provided by the Mayor of London was that it was in order to “tackle gun crime
in London and knife crime as well”, but this did little to quell the increasing
concerns.
I have been suspicious of
the Metropolitan Police since I was a child
and it is no secret that I think the organisation is beyond reform and needs closing
down. So I am not somebody who can be
easily shocked when coming to terms with new revelations about an institution
which I have labelled as being the most corrupt force in Western Europe. Yet even I found this all to be appalling and
extremely distressing. I’ve had a week
to digest the news and it still resembles being hit by a truck.
Some people in the last
three years have used the expression “State execution” when referring to the
death of Mark Duggan. If these
revelations represent the facts of what really happened that fateful August
evening then they were mistaken to deploy such a phrase. This was never an execution administered by
the State. This was an unlawful killing committed
by criminals. I echo the calls
made by Stafford Scott last weekend- we must have a public inquiry. We need to establish the truth and scrutinise
the nature of the relationship that existed between Trident and Kevin
Hutchinson-Foster.
No comments:
Post a Comment